Couver Up

The Timbers took command of the Cascadia Cup standings with a deserved 2-1 victory at home to Vancouver Whitecaps, setting themselves up for a huge match against Seattle in a couple of weeks – as if that particular tie needed any more hype.

I suspected that Kimura would miss the match after he tickled Tim Cahill’s elbow with his nose last week, but to my surprise and relief he was named in the Starting XI. Relief as I’d psyched myself up for a Lovel Palmer master class at full-back this week, and that would be avoided.

The only change made by Gavin Wilkinson was an enforced one, with Eric Alexander coming in for Diego Chara. I wasn’t surprised to see Dike retain his place as it would be hard to drop a guy who scored the previous week. Kris Boyd warmed the bench once more.

In truth, there wasn’t much between the teams in the early stages with the Timbers showing some patience in retaining the ball that was so often lacking in Spencer’s team. There was always a sense under Spenny that if the team put more than three or four passes together and hadn’t made it to the edge of the opposition box, the ball would be launched forward in desperation.

It was Donovan Ricketts’ first home match as a Timber, and he gave the Timbers Army a taste of what he could do with a fantastic long throw early on that put Franck Songo’o in.

It’s certainly different from what we’d become used to with Troy Perkins, whose big failing was often his distribution. In truth though, despite some blockbuster throws and kicks, Ricketts could do with changing it up now and then as he seemed to rely too often on the long ball out.

Nevertheless, I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that in this department at least, the move to bring in the Jamaican does represent an “upgrade”, even if I remain resolutely unconvinced that’s he’s any better a shot stopper or defensive organiser than Perkins.

It was through quick breaks that the Timbers tended to get most joy in attack, though Songo’o was having one of those games where he wasn’t as effective as he has been in the past. Down the right we have Sal Zizzo who gives a lot of pace and width, but down the left Songo’o seemed more intent on coming inside rather than testing the Vancouver full-backs.

As Nagbe looks up having gotten the ball in deep midfield, I’d be wanting Songo’o to pull on the shoulder of his man and go wide to stretch the play, but instead he runs straight down the middle where the Whitecaps have DeMerit covering.

Even with the ball at his feet, he’d invariably narrow the attack.

I don’t doubt Songo’o has bags of talent, but at times he seems to lack the instinct to play the role he’s been given. It’s like he wants to beat players at all costs, even if that means running right towards a mass of defenders instead of pulling off towards space and letting the rest of the team find gaps to exploit.

This break came only a couple of minutes before the Timbers opened the scoring, and the way the team used width is a nice contrast.

Dike’s pulling DeMerit out of position is key to this whole passage of play, and you can see how stretched the Vancouver defence is by his run out wide. Compare that to how narrow Songo’o allowed them to get in his breakaway chance.

Using the width, even in a shoe box like Jeld-Wen Field, isn’t just about getting it to the wingers so that they can swing cross after cross into the box – it’s also about creating space in the centre and that’s what you saw in the goal. The Timbers found themselves with players in space in a dangerous area, and instead of a mass of four or five defenders in their way, there were two.

It was still a fantastic touch by Nagbe to take two players out of the game, and a lovely finish, but the work of Dike shouldn’t be underestimated in helping engineer the chance in the first place.

Dike had had an earlier chance when he made a good front-to-back post move to get between DeMerit and the fullback for a header from a fantastic Smith cross, but he hit the post. In truth, I didn’t think Dike had an especially great game, but he worked hard and he’s a presence up top that the opposition can’t ignore.

Vancouver lined up without a Dike figure in attack, going with a more mobile and fluid front line that looked to pull the Timbers defence around to create space for balls into feet. To the Timbers credit, they didn’t allow this to happen and stuck to their jobs, apart from one moment in the first half.

Miller’s move was key in this move as the the Timbers were pretty well matched up across the back and in midfield. By dropping off though he gave Vancouver a man extra against Jewsbury, and forced Horst to follow him out lest the ball go into his feet.

However Horst’s move left space for the attacker to move into and Vancouver created a shooting chance. I don’t want to give Horst too much of a kicking here as I understand why he felt he had to match Miller. It was exactly the kind of move I feared we’d see from Vancouver, but fortunately this was really the only time they were able to make the Timbers defence do their bidding.

However, Horst certainly didn’t cover himself in glory with the Vancouver goal, which came after a disputed corner kick in the dying seconds of the first half.

Again, I can see why he was covering across (though I don’t think he had to) but he completely switched off and was caught on his heels when the ball was cleared when his first instinct should’ve been to push out. By dallying he gave Miller an easy chance to open his MLS account.

The problem with Horst, as I see it, is he’s 95% of a decent, workable MLS defender. But that 5% represents a lack of concentration and poor decision making that seems to manifest itself in a mistake at least once a game. And when you’re the last man, making a mistake can often be fatal.

There were shades of the New York match as the Timbers through away a lead in the dying moments of the half, with help from questionable officiating, and there can’t have been many fans who didn’t have at least a momentary panic that we’d seen how this story ends before.

Losing such a controversial goal at such a horrible time would’ve at least made Wilkinson’s team talk pretty easy, as I don’t doubt the team were fired up by a sense of injustice. Aside from the way the goal came about, there was also the sense that we deserved the lead on merit any way.

The second half followed much the same pattern as the first. There’s not a great deal between these clubs, but the Timbers probably edged it.

Songo’o continued to delight on one hand, and frustrate on the other.

There’s no doubt that Songo’o is a skilful player, but he’d benefit at times from getting his head up and taking the easy way out rather than over-complicating things. But I guess, if he was the complete package he wouldn’t be ex-Barcelona, let alone ex-Portsmouth.

He’d soon delight the Timbers faithful with the 2nd, and decisive, goal from a free kick. He did well to get the ball up, over the wall and back down but Joe Cannon had an absolute howler. The Vancouver keeper somehow endeavoured to let the ball squirm through his grasp and into the net.

Having to chase the game, the Whitecaps threw on Mattocks and switched from a 4-2-3-1 to more of a 4-4-2, with one holding midfielder instead of the two they had previously. I thought that perhaps , with a bit of daring, the Timbers could’ve pushed someone in midfield a little further forward and look to hurt Vancouver here, but we never did.

Mattocks wouldn’t have any great impact on the game, though he did have on David Horst’s face when a clumsy jump for the ball saw him lead his arms. He got a red card, though I felt a yellow would’ve been warranted, but in truth the Timbers looked pretty comfortable playing against 11 – one good chance for the Whitecaps aside when Steven Smith was called upon to head the ball off the line.

Smith, after a shaky spell a while ago, seems to be settling a bit more and looking much more assured at left-back. He and Kimura both had solid games, and it’s telling that Vancouver were able to get very little joy down the wings.

Another player who impressed me greatly was Eric Alexander. Much of what was good about the Timbers going forward would invariably go through Alexander at some point, and he stepped into the Chara role with aplomb. I’ve never really take much note of his defensive work in the past, but I thought he was quietly effective in this aspect of the game and helped out when needed. Chances are that he’ll sit out the next game when Chara returns which is a shame, but if you’re going to have problems it’s much better to have too many good players to fit into the midfield than not enough.

Jewsbury was also efficient in his role. Given the way that Vancouver’s forward line were all over the place it would’ve been easy for him to get pulled around and taken out of position but he stuck to his role and did the unglamorous work of keeping it tight at the back and quickly passing the ball on to his more attack-minded team mates to take forward.

The whistle was met with a mixture of relief and joy. It’s Wilkinson’s first win as interim head coach, and if rumours about Caleb Porter’s imminent appointment prove to be true, it may be his only win. I don’t know a great deal about Porter, though I’ll be doing a fair bit of reading if it does pan out, but he certainly did all right according to Football Manager 2012!

Porter was, of course, Nagbe’s coach at Akron and if it’s true that the new man has been consulted for some time on team matters, it’s quite interesting to note how Darlington’s performances have really picked up in the last few weeks. Coincidence? Probably, but still… If anyone is going to get the best from him, you’d have to think the guy who made his a star at college level has a pretty good shot.

Overall, I thought we deserved the win, though I actually felt the team played better for long spells against Toronto and New York. But against Vancouver we put together a much more complete performance across (most of) the 90 and breaking the long run without a win will hopefully give the team the impetus to kick on and end the season on a hopeful note for next year.

I posted a couple of graphics on twitter that show how the team aren’t actually that far off repeating our 2011 record.

The main difference is that we’ve really struggled to keep clean sheets this year. We actually kept as many clean sheets on the road in 2011 as we have done in the entire 2012 season thus far – 3. As long as we keep making elementary mistakes at the back it’s hard to see that situation improving, so the incoming coach certainly has a job on his hands whipping them into shape.

Colorado Rapids, fresh from a spanking in San Jose, are next up at Jeld-Wen at the end of the week. A victory against the Rapids would see the Timbers overhaul them in the table and, if results go our way, possibly even Chivas too.

It’s been a funny old year.

#RCTID


[post_ender]

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Couver Up

  1. Great match, Steve Smith stepped up and saved the win for the boys in green!
    #GavinggavemeRicketts and I liked it!

  2. (1) Horst has taken criticism for the Vancouver goal, but I haven’t heard anyone question Kimura’s positioning on the play, which seems horrid to me.

    (2) I completely share your concerns about Songo’o. I also feel like Alhassan wants to cut inside too often. Your graphic a few weeks ago comparing the positioning of Songo’o and Shea was illuminating. Zizzo seems like the only true winger.

    (3) Assuming that Nagbe is a starter, out of Chara, Jewsbury, and Alexander, which two do you want? My thought has long been that Chara and Jewsbury together stifles our offense. There’s some debate going on about Chara vs. Jack. Your thoughts?

    (4) After these last few games, in which our midfield has looked good, I’d say our offseason priorities ought to be some really top-notch fullbacks (assuming we’re going 4-3-3).

    1. 1) I didn’t think Kimura’s positioning was that bad, to be honest. The only issue I’d have is, in the pitcure on the second panel, you can see he’s covering a guy in the centre but by the time the ball gets fired in towards Miller, Kimura has let his man drift off into space. Other than that, he held the line with Mosquera, and Miller would’ve been clearly offside had Horst not been prowling around.

      3) I like having Chara in a more advanced role and, to his credit, I think Jewsbury has improved in the anchor role. Four into three doesn’t really go, alas. I think Alexander loses out in that equation, though given the way he played against Vancouver, I’d like to see Chara back in the sitting role and Alexander told to give more of the same.

      4) If we keep Smith, and get him a proper preseason etc, I think there is potential there. Kimura is decent, but for me he’s often a bit soft in the tackle and doesn’t offer much going past the halfway line, so we could probably do with someone there. I’d also like to see a proper left winger signed. In Zizzo/Alhassan out right and Songo’o/NewGuy out left we’d have good options to switch up between inside-out winger or conventional wingers, depending on circumstance. It would give the attack some variation. I also think we need a centre-back. That would be my #1, #2 and #3 priorities – centre back, winger and full back.

      1. Thanks. follow-up on (4): So you don’t think Brunner, Horst, or Futty are starter quality? or is it Brunner’s health that concerns you? What do you think of Jean-Baptiste’s potential

      2. I don’t think Horst is good enough. Futty is 29 and hasn’t really stood out (though I think he fits a bit better with Mosquera), so I doubt he’s going to get any better when he starts losing what little pace he has. AJB has potential, for sure, but I think he’s maybe a bit raw to go straight in, though I’d love to see him given a chance and if he does well, then perhaps CB isn’t such a priority. What (little) I saw of him earlier this year was encouraging. There’s a ball-playing defender in there.

        Brunner’s health does worry me, and I think a long lay-off has a tendency to inflate a player’s ability in the eyes of fans – let’s not forget the defence wasn’t great with Brunner in it either, though he’s undoubtedly better than Horst or Futty.

        Central defence is a high impact position so I worry that with such a long lay-off from concussion, there’s a good chance of further problems down the line if and when Brunner does get back to playing and one of the central pillars to having a good defence is having a settled defence. I don’t think we can base a stable defence on a guy who’s got a question mark over his head.

      3. I think I’m also a little confused about Kimura’s positioning on that goal. He’s usually our right-back but, for whatever reason, on that play he’d gone to center and Horst was forced to play right-back. Is this okay? Are the backs allowed to shift around a bit? Should Horst have seen Kimura’s change-of-position and moved right to cover the empty space? (This may be an obvious answer but, as I’ve long said, I’m just an ignorant yank.)

      4. From memory, I believe Kimura was on the front post for the corner – Horst was marking Miller and he followed him out when Miller made a run past the front post. It was as the play developed, Kimura pushed out, Horst lost track of Miller and before you know it he’d drifted into space behind both of them.

  3. I am hesitant to bring this up because I should just stop and smell the roses, BUT I keep reading about how Nagbe is playing better. I’m trying to figure out why. Is it a confidence issue? He looks like a different player when his attacking midfield and striker lineup is his age or maturity level. Is it an experience issue? He now is close to two full MLS seasons.

    1. What I’m seeing from him is more play going forward instead of to the side and back. He’s more willing to run with the ball at his feet, whereas he seemed really hesitant to do so before and as a result he was being caught in possession often.

      Under Spencer’s system, he would often be played at the tip of the diamond, which meant he either neglected to cover back, leaving us exposed through the centre, or he dropped off to the detriment of his attacking game. In the 4-3-3 he’s playing frorm a little bit deeper as a starting position, but he seems to have more of a “go out and play” instruction rather than the conflicting be a focal point for the attack/track back and defend instructions he had in the 4-4-2. It seems to have lifted some of the weight off him, and as he’s improved the good performances have bred more confidence, which in turns feeds better play.

    2. Another possibility is that Boyd makes the difference with Nagbe. Boyd really wanted Nagbe to provide service to him–as a first priority–and so apparently applied a great deal of pressure to the young Nagbe everytime the ball came his way. Nagbe surely would be heavily influenced by the DP Scottish all-time scorer Boyd, and often seemed unsure of what to do when he had the ball on the field.

      Even now he seems to have a slow trigger at times, as though he has to think it through before he is willing to take the shot/make the pass anywhere but to Boyd.

      Perhaps it is the interpersonal space opened up on the field sans Boyd, that is responsible for Nagbe’s emergence?

      1. I think that’s a good point. Boyd is absolutely a #1 striker, and everyone knows it. He wants the ball and won’t be shy in telling you about it, and I’m sure the team talk pre-match would feature a lot of “Get the ball to Kris”.

        I don’t think Dike has such a dominant on-field personality so perhaps there isn’t that emphasis on the attackers to feed Boyd – though you could make a case that there wasn’t enough emphasis to find Boyd’s feet when he was on the pitch!

        It’s an interesting thought and one I hadn’t really considered before.

  4. Franck Songo’o may frustrate at times with his 1 v 1 decisions, but he does a lot right too. But that’s being creative, it’s unpredictable and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t. I’ll take that all day over rigid, stifling play that doesn’t suit the personnel. I would say his ball skill, athleticism, and improved fitness makes him increasingly tough to handle for most MLS defenders and wingers. That’s something we really have not had anywhere in midfield. Also, I think the guys really respect Songo’o and enjoy playing with him. I see leadership emerging.

    1. Like I’ve said in the past, I like him and think he’s talented, but there are times when the better skill isn’t trying to beat your man to squeeze in a cross into a crowded box, but in slowing it down and laying it off, or in attacking the width so as to give your team mates space through the middle.

      We’ve seen much better from Songo’o in the past, so we know he’s capable of putting all this together across the 90 (or 70, as was his usual match length!), but in this match I just got the feeling that he was playing more as an individual at times than a team player. There were flashes of how great he could be, but it would invariably be followed up by something frustrating.

      I simply didn’t think he had anywhere near his best game, and is capable of much better but that doesn’t mean I think he was bad. I agree with most of your points, which is why I expect and hope for that little bit more from Franck than what I felt we got at the weekend.

Wise Men say...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s